Sunday, January 29, 2023
News on Pathogens and Preparedness
Global Biodefense
  • Featured
  • COVID-19
  • Funding
  • Directory
  • Jobs
  • Events
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Featured
  • COVID-19
  • Funding
  • Directory
  • Jobs
  • Events
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Global Biodefense
No Result
View All Result
Home Biosecurity

Disagreement Among Experts Over Bioweapons Threat

by Global Biodefense Staff
August 21, 2015
UTMB Vaccine Center Research

Amid continued difficulties around assessing “dual-use” research and bioweapons threats, especially given limited empirical data, some researchers took another route to gauge their danger: the collective judgment of multiple experts.

Crystal Boddie, Matthew Watson and Gigi Kwik Gronvall from the UPMC Center for Health Security, with Gary Ackerman from the University of Maryland, College Park, led the assessment published today in Science.

The surveyed experts’ opinions on bioweapons-related risks were quite diverse, the authors say, adding to the challenge around developing a regulatory system for legitimate dual-use research.

The team employed a Delphi Method study to query the beliefs and opinions of 59 experts in order to assess the bioweapons threat and the potential for misuse of scientific research toward bioweapons development.

Questions asked of the experts included a range of biosecurity issues, for example:

  • Most likely actor to conduct a biological attack
  • Most likely agents to be used in an attack
  • The ability of the intelligence community to anticipate such an occurrence
  • The appropriateness of biodefense experiments

The participants’ experience and expertise varied, and so did their opinions. Those trained as biological scientists perceived a lower likelihood of bioweapons use than other participants, in many cases. And experts older than 50 years of age believed the likelihood of an attack was greater than did Generation X and/or Millennials (21 to 49 years of age).

The analysis aimed to examine biosafety concerns, the potential for such research to produce a biological weapons agent, and the possibility that publication of research such as “gain-of-function” studies may lower barriers to bioweapons development.

The results portray the disagreement among authorities over the threat from biological weapons.

Read more at Science: Assessing the bioweapons threat. (Login Required)

Tags: BiosafetyDual Use Research of Concern (DURC)

Related Posts

Influenza Proteins Tilt and Wave in ‘Breath-like’ Motions
Pathogens

Influenza Proteins Tilt and Wave in ‘Breath-like’ Motions

January 25, 2023
Liverpool Synthetic Biology Lab Backed By 2M Award
Policy + Initiatives

Political Interference: White House Launches Framework to Protect Scientific Integrity

January 13, 2023
DARPA Selects Teams to Develop Vaccine Durability Prediction Model
Medical Countermeasures

DARPA Selects Teams to Develop Vaccine Durability Prediction Model

January 13, 2023
The device appears smaller than a playing card, transparent, with visible channels branching off.
Medical Countermeasures

How Organ-on-a-chip Models Could Grease the Drug Development Pipeline

January 10, 2023
Load More

Latest News

Partner Therapeutics’ Novel Approach to Stratify Sepsis Patients Gains Backing From BARDA

Biopreparedness Research Virtual Environment (BRaVE) Initiative Backed by $105M DOE Funding

January 25, 2023
Influenza Proteins Tilt and Wave in ‘Breath-like’ Motions

Influenza Proteins Tilt and Wave in ‘Breath-like’ Motions

January 25, 2023
Biodefense Headlines – 24 January 2023

Biodefense Headlines – 24 January 2023

January 24, 2023
Biodefense Headlines – 17 January 2023

Biodefense Headlines – 17 January 2023

January 17, 2023

Subscribe

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Stemar Media Group LLC

No Result
View All Result
  • Featured
  • COVID-19
  • Funding
  • Directory
  • Jobs
  • Events
  • Subscribe

© 2022 Stemar Media Group LLC