In a sweeping structural overhaul outlined in the FY 2026 Congressional Budget Justification, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposes the complete disbanding and redistribution of its Office for Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD). The reorganization builds on years of leadership vacuums and strategic drift that began under the Trump-Pence Administration (2017–2021), during which the CWMD Office experienced significant attrition, with key leadership positions left unfilled or occupied by acting officials for extended periods. These vacancies, coupled with inconsistent funding and oversight, weakened national coordination for CBRNE defense.
The Biden-Harris Administration (2021–2025) took steps to reestablish the CWMD Office’s relevance—stabilizing funding, reaffirming strategic priorities such as biosurveillance and threat assessment, and reinforcing the office’s interagency engagement. However, CWMD never fully recovered its operational authority or institutional cohesion during that period.
Now, under the Trump-Vance Administration (2025–present), DHS has formalized the full dissolution of CWMD in the FY 2026 budget request—transferring all personnel, programs, and budget authority to other DHS components. The move is framed by DHS as a way to “create synergies and efficiencies” by aligning capabilities with mission-executing components. For many in the CBRNE, biosecurity, and national preparedness communities, however, it represents a profound structural break from the centralized WMD countermeasure model that had served as a federal coordination hub for over a decade.
Understanding the Threat
Weapons of mass destruction refer to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosive threats that can cause large-scale harm to people, the environment, and critical infrastructure such as transportation systems, power grids, and public health networks. These threats range from the covert release of a biological agent like anthrax in a subway, to the detonation of a radiological “dirty bomb,” to cyber-enabled attacks targeting nuclear facilities. What makes WMDs particularly dangerous is that even small amounts of material—if undetected—can trigger mass casualties, widespread panic, and long-term disruption to essential services. Detecting and countering these threats requires sophisticated technology, interagency coordination, and a sustained investment in preparedness.
Key Findings and Implications
Full Elimination of the CWMD Office
CWMD is being dismantled in its entirety. All 286 positions and the $409.4 million in funding that supported operations, research, procurement, and federal assistance will be reassigned.
- No funds are requested for FY 2026 under CWMD’s former accounts.
- CWMD’s policy, coordination, and oversight roles are redistributed, marking a historic shift away from centralized WMD threat management within DHS.
Strategic Transfers of CBRN Functions
All CWMD responsibilities will be divided across other DHS entities, with potentially mixed implications for strategic continuity and stakeholder engagement.
- Policy and Architecture: Transferred to the DHS Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans (OSEM/Policy), which now assumes leadership on nuclear detection architecture and material threat determinations.
- NBIC Biosurveillance: The National Biosurveillance Integration Center is moved to the DHS Office of Health Security, preserving its mission but further separating biosurveillance from other WMD functions.
- Operational Programs: Including BioWatch, Mobile Detection Deployment, and Securing the Cities, are now under CISA’s Infrastructure Security Division, integrating CBRN response into a broader infrastructure protection portfolio.
Research and Detection Equipment Realigned
Technological innovation and equipment procurement will now occur closer to mission execution—but with potential loss of centralized R&D strategy.
- CBRNE R&D: Relocated to the U.S. Coast Guard, a component with operational needs but historically limited in leading enterprise-wide innovation.
- Radiation Portal Monitor Support: Now with CBP, taking over responsibilities under the SAFE Port Act.
Procurement budgets for detection systems—once managed with a system-wide view—will now be scattered across operational agencies like CBP and TSA, raising questions about standardization, lifecycle management, and cross-agency interoperability.
Federal Assistance Programs Absorbed by CISA
CWMD’s $142.9 million Federal Assistance portfolio is fully transferred to CISA, which now oversees:
- Securing the Cities (STC): Urban nuclear detection efforts previously coordinated through CWMD regional offices.
- BioWatch: The nation’s primary bioterrorism early warning system, still operational but managed under a new organizational construct.
- Training and Exercises: SLTT-focused programs on preparedness for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) events are now part of CISA’s broader mission set.
These programs remain active, but the transfer may challenge continuity in stakeholder engagement, training delivery, and interagency planning.
Implications for CBRNE and C-WMD Stakeholders
The CWMD reorganization under the Trump-Vance Administration marks a definitive structural pivot. It attempts to embed CBRNE responsibilities more tightly with operational missions—but follows years of instability that originated during the Trump-Pence era and were only partially mitigated under the Biden-Harris team.
- Improved mission alignment may accelerate deployment of detection technologies and frontline capabilities.
- However, fragmentation of policy, R&D, and stakeholder coordination across multiple DHS components may make it more difficult for industry, academia, and local responders to engage with DHS on integrated CBRNE solutions.
- Loss of centralized oversight raises the risk of duplication, uneven prioritization, and diminished capacity to respond to emerging or cross-cutting WMD threats.
This structural change redefines how DHS manages the evolving threat landscape—but it leaves behind a CWMD model that once unified R&D, strategy, acquisition, and SLTT partnership under a single roof.
Impact of Personnel Cuts on CWMD Transition
The Trump-Vance Administration’s broader push for DHS workforce reductions adds further complexity to the CWMD realignment. The FY 2026 budget reflects the elimination of all 286 CWMD positions and 263 full-time equivalents (FTEs), but this shift occurs alongside parallel efforts to downsize or consolidate personnel across multiple DHS Components. As CWMD responsibilities are handed off to agencies like CISA, CBP, and the U.S. Coast Guard, it remains unclear whether these receiving entities will receive sufficient staffing resources—or if they will be expected to absorb new mission loads with limited additional capacity. Extensive cuts are also planned for the Transportation Security Administration. This raises concerns among experts and stakeholders that the practical execution of critical CBRNE functions could suffer from under-resourcing just as institutional knowledge and continuity are being dispersed.
Conclusion
The FY 2026 DHS budget delivers both a bureaucratic reckoning and a strategic reorientation of the nation’s counter-WMD apparatus. While proponents may see benefits in decentralizing execution, the dissolution of CWMD underscores the long-term impacts of prior administrative neglect and signals a more fragmented, component-led future for CBRNE preparedness. Success will now hinge on how effectively DHS’s new custodians of CWMD responsibilities collaborate to maintain coherence, capability, and innovation in the face of complex and evolving threats.
Department of Homeland Security, Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction FY 2026 Congressional Budget Justification.
READ ALSO:
The Hill: The US can’t afford to dismantle DHS’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Office
Homeland Security Today: Former DHS Official Warns Against Dismantling Weapons of Mass Destruction Office
Federal News Network: DHS budget request would split up CWMD office
Roll Call: Appropriations panel chair asks Noem for more budget information
Federal News Network: DHS budget request would cut CISA staff by 1,000 positions